Connect with us

Analysis

Who is China’s greatest adversary?

China's greatest adversary

Throughout history, the rise and fall of empires have shaped the course of international relations, leaving indelible marks on the global landscape. From the ancient civilizations of Mesopotamia and Egypt to the mighty Roman and Mongol empires, the quest for power, territory, and resources has been a driving force behind geopolitical maneuvering. These historical examples serve as poignant reminders of the complexities inherent in navigating international relations, where rivalries and alliances shape the ebb and flow of global dynamics. Just as past empires sought to expand their influence and control, modern nations, particularly China, grapples with similar ambitions on a global scale.

We are in a quest to find China’s number 1 enemy. It is essential to approach this topic with a balanced perspective and understand that international relations are complex, with many shades of gray. There are multiple arguments, facts, statistics and examples that second facts that in our contemporary world that who is the foremost enemy of China. Let us analyze different situations and draw parallels for our analysis.

South China Sea Disputes

Historically, the South China Sea has been a critical nexus of trade, geopolitical strategy, and territorial contestation. As China’s global influence has surged, so too has its activity in this maritime realm, intensifying debates about its role as a potential primary adversary. Central to this debate is China’s extensive territorial claims, which fly in the face of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). While UNCLOS traditionally allows for specific maritime boundaries, China’s ambitious claims and its decision not to ratify the treaty, despite signing it, challenge this international norm.

China’s militarization of the South China Sea, marked by the creation of artificial islands and their subsequent armament, threatens regional stability. Such aggressive posturing, coupled with tactics of intimidation against foreign ships, pin points its escalating assertiveness. This assertiveness isn’t new; historical skirmishes such as the Battle of the Paracel Islands in 1974 highlight the region’s volatility.

Strategically, the South China Sea’s importance is undeniable. A staggering $3.5 trillion worth of shipping traffic traverses its waters annually, and it acts as a pivotal route for oil and gas transportation from the Middle East to East Asia. Beyond this, the latent potential of its rich fishing grounds and untapped oil and gas reserves showcase the region’s geoeconomic value.

Advertisement

The dynamics in the South China Sea present a challenge to U.S. leadership in the Asia-Pacific. As China leverages its growing economic and military prowess to stake its dominance, the U.S., in championing navigation freedom and decrying regional militarization, finds itself on a collision course with the Asian giant. The tensions between these two superpowers in this maritime realm serve as a microcosm of the broader geopolitical landscape, often casting China in the role of a primary global adversary. 

Trade Wars

China’s trade behavior has, for decades, been a point of contention in international relations, especially with the United States, solidifying its position as a perceived primary adversary in global economic dynamics. Historically rooted trade grievances like intellectual property theft and forced technology transfers have caused significant friction. For instance, numerous American corporations have accused China of pilfering their intellectual properties, a glaring testament to Beijing’s aggressive approach to economic advancement. Furthermore, the coercive strategies that oblige American entities to share technology with Chinese counterparts before accessing their market are not just aggressive, but also tilt the playing field in favor of Chinese businesses.

Statistically speaking, the ramifications of China’s trade strategies manifest in the growing trade deficit that the U.S. endures, which exceeded $350 billion. This imbalance, continually expanding, highlights the economic strain the U.S. faces because of these practices. Such practices, beyond individual instances, cost American industries billions of dollars, both from intellectual property theft and losses in the job market due to unlevel competition.

Historical insights into the issue are evident in the Trump administration’s response in 2018. Addressing these inequities, tariffs were slapped on Chinese goods, a move reciprocated by China, igniting a trade war that has had far-reaching consequences on the global economic fabric. Consumers globally bear the brunt with increased prices, while businesses in both nations grapple with the fallout, highlighting profound discord in U.S. China relations.

To many, China’s trade strategies not only signify economic transgressions but also threats to the U.S.’s national security. This perspective views China’s maneuvers as an ambitious drive for global economic hegemony, warranting a fortified U.S. stance to safeguard its national interests. On the flip side, a segment believes in the potential of U.S.-China collaboration despite these challenges.

Advertisement

Given these intricacies, China’s trade conduct and the consequent American responses firmly place it in the limelight of international debates, often casting it as the foremost global adversary.

Human Rights Concerns

China’s human rights transgressions, particularly concerning the Uighur Muslim community in Xinjiang, have escalated its perception as the foremost global adversary. Historically, nations have clashed over territorial and economic ambitions; however, gross human rights violations like those in Xinjiang have catapulted these concerns to the forefront of international discourse.

China’s maltreatment of religious minorities, especially the Uighurs, stands as a glaring example to its authoritarian approach. The campaign against the Uighurs isn’t merely repression—it’s an orchestrated endeavor encompassing mass detentions, forced labor, and a calculated effort to erase their cultural identity. Notable instances from the past, as highlighted by Human Rights Watch, reveal over 1 million Uighurs and Muslim minorities incarcerated in Xinjiang internment camps, facing forced labor, political indoctrination, and even torture. The destruction of mosques and religious landmarks by the Chinese government further attests to this repression.

Statistics strengthen the accusations against Beijing. A 2021 study by the Australian Strategic Policy Institute unveiled the construction of over 400 “political re-education” centers in Xinjiang. Simultaneously, the United Nations in 2022 provided compelling evidence of Uighurs undergoing “torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.”

Advertisement

China’s blanket denial of these allegations contrasts starkly against an accumulating reservoir of evidence pointing toward their intensive clampdown on the Uighurs.

The aforementioned human rights infringements have strained China’s relations with the global community, placing it under the microscope as a leading global antagonist. Nations worldwide, including the U.S., have vociferously condemned China’s tactics in Xinjiang, with some imposing sanctions. From the American perspective, Xinjiang’s situation is not just about the Uighurs but a reflection of China’s broader ambitions and disregard for international norms.

China’s track record in Xinjiang will undoubtedly remain a contentious point, magnifying its image as a primary antagonist in global geopolitics.

Hong Kong Autonomy and Taiwan Tensions

In the global arena, where nations maneuver for influence and power, China’s handling of Hong Kong and Taiwan has intensified perceptions of it as the preeminent adversary, especially from a Western perspective.

Hong Kong, once a bastion of freedoms and autonomy under the “One Country, Two Systems” model, has witnessed a rapid erosion of its cherished liberties since the introduction of the National Security Law. This legislation, framed under the pretext of ensuring stability, has ironically sparked instability. Critics assert that it effectively muzzles any dissent against Beijing’s rule, a stark deviation from the region’s erstwhile democratic fabric. Historical instances, like the large-scale pro-democracy protests that once engulfed the city, are now met with swift crackdowns. Prominent pro-democracy activists are routinely arrested, and freedom of expression is increasingly curtailed. Since the law’s 2020 introduction, Amnesty International highlights that over 10,000 arrests have been made, reflecting the law’s draconian nature. This relentless grip on Hong Kong recalls memories of the city’s handover in 1997, where promises of preserving its freedoms for 50 years now seem ephemeral.

Advertisement

Taiwan’s situation is equally tense. While the island has thrived independently since 1949, China’s claim and refusal to acknowledge its sovereignty remains a significant flashpoint. The waters of the Taiwan Strait have turned into a cauldron of military tensions, with China’s frequent military exercises and its intrusion into Taiwan’s air defense zones. The fact that China possesses the world’s largest military budget and navy, as indicated by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, adds gravitas to its threats. Historically, despite these pressures, Taiwan has resolutely maintained its stance, supported ambiguously by the U.S. through its policy of “strategic ambiguity.”

Such actions towards both Hong Kong and Taiwan amplify the narrative of China as antagonist. To many, especially in the West, these aggressive postures signify a larger Chinese ambition to exert its dominance globally, both economically and militarily. Opponents argue that if unchecked, China’s actions in these regions could set a precedent for other international interventions, while others feel there’s still room for cooperation and mutual understanding.

Economic Coercion

In an era of rapidly shifting global power dynamics, China’s assertive use of economic leverage raises alarms. Historically, nations have always jostled for influence, but China’s approach has been unique in its blend of economic might and strategic coercion. By leveraging its position as the world’s second-largest economy, China has wielded its economic muscle to bend global geopolitics to its will, often in ways that are seen to contravene international norms. A case in point is how China has been quick to threaten economic sanctions against nations recognizing Taiwan or casting a spotlight on its controversial human rights practices. It has also not hesitated to halt imports from countries that dared to impose sanctions on it. Beyond state-level pressures, international corporations aren’t immune either. Historically, the prerequisite for many foreign firms seeking a slice of the Chinese market pie has often been technology transfers to local Chinese enterprises.

Such strategies aren’t mere anecdotal. In a 2021 survey by the European Union Chamber of Commerce in China, an astonishing 75% of European businesses reported experiencing some form of economic arm-twisting, from market access restrictions and discriminatory government procurement practices to the aforementioned forced technology handovers.

Given China’s immense trade surplus with numerous countries and its gargantuan foreign exchange reserves, its economic clout is undeniable. This economic coercion is a palpable source of friction between China and the United States. To some, China’s tactics symbolize an existential challenge to U.S. global leadership and national security. They argue that China’s intent isn’t mere regional dominance but global supremacy, prompting calls for a more confrontational U.S. stance. Yet, there exists a contrasting viewpoint suggesting that while China’s methods are assertive, they don’t necessarily spell doom for U.S.-China cooperation on various fronts.

Advertisement

Digital Espionage

Throughout history, nations have used espionage as a tool to further their interests, and China’s tryst with it is deeply rooted in its past. The 19th century saw China resorting to espionage to demystify Western technologies and military know-how. Fast forward to the 20th century, espionage became China’s silent weapon during the tumultuous Cold War era. Now, in the age of digitalization, this crafty pursuit has taken on a more covert, digital form.

China’s digital espionage initiatives aren’t merely conjectures but are bolstered by events and data. Back in 2017, the U.S. Department of Justice indicted five Chinese nationals for allegedly infiltrating the computer networks of corporate giants like Westinghouse Electric and SolarWorld. A year later, in 2018, a stern warning came from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, cautioning that Chinese cyber operatives were eyeing critical infrastructures, notably power and water systems. By 2020, tech behemoth Microsoft identified novel malware strains emanating from China, designed to infiltrate U.S. and European governmental bodies and think tanks.

And it isn’t just isolated incidents. In a comprehensive study conducted in 2021 by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), the findings were explicit: China was spearheading malicious cyber activities against the U.S, casting a wide net that encompassed sectors from government and defense to academia.

This aggressive digital footprint, coupled with China’s historical opacity regarding its cyber intentions, a combative stance on intellectual property rights, its rapidly expanding military arsenal, and its ballooning global economic clout, highlights the growing apprehensions surrounding China. Many in the West, particularly the U.S., view these activities as direct threats to national security, with concerns that China aims to filch intellectual property and classified data to secure economic and technological ascendancies. While some voices argue for a cooperative approach between the U.S. and China, the overwhelming sentiment tilts towards suspicion.

Belt and Road Initiative (BRI)

The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), China’s grand global infrastructure project, harks back to the nation’s historical approach to expanding its influence.

Advertisement

Centuries ago, China conceived the famed Silk Road, connecting its vast territories with far west and the Middle East, showcasing its deep-rooted inclination towards using trade routes to extend its reach. Fast forward to the 20th century, China’s massive investments in regions like Africa and Latin America reflect a similar playbook, suggesting a consistent pattern in its foreign relations strategy.

Today’s BRI is seen by many as an ambitious extension of these historical tactics. Under the banner of the BRI, infrastructural behemoths have risen. Notable examples include massive projects in Pakistan and Sri Lanka, countries that have taken substantial loans from China for these endeavors. There’s a looming cloud of concern, as these heavy financial obligations might push these nations towards potential debt traps, rendering them susceptible to Chinese control in case of defaults.

However, it’s not just the economic ramifications of the BRI that raise eyebrows. The environmental consequences, too, are under scrutiny. The Chinese-funded dam in Ethiopia serves as a stark example, where the project has resulted in significant displacements and ecological degradation.

Statistically, the numbers are staggering. The BRI is poised to be a multi-trillion dollar endeavor. With China already pouring billions into it, the global economic and geopolitical axis seems to be tilting.

Critics view the BRI as more than just infrastructure. They warn of potential militarization – the idea that the BRI could be a conduit for increased Chinese military presence in partner nations.

Advertisement

While many in the West, particularly the United States, view these activities as a direct challenge to their global preeminence. When synthesized, the historical patterns, the colossal financial commitments, the strategic placements of these projects, and the potential geopolitical implications make the BRI a focal point in the debate around China’s role as the chief geopolitical adversary.

Diplomacy Tactics

China’s “Wolf Warrior” diplomacy, a reference to its increasingly combative approach in international relations, is often cited as a linchpin in the mounting arguments positioning China as the prime geopolitical adversary.

Historically, China has never shied away from assertive diplomacy. The nation’s past is punctuated with episodes of resistance against external pressures, notably the series of confrontations in the 19th century with Western powers.

Fast forward to recent times, the “Wolf Warrior” strategy has found its manifestation in a series of confrontations. For instance, in 2017, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi, taking a bold stance, warned the U.S. of China’s intent to “fight to the end” if the latter challenged its South China Sea interests. Such assertiveness wasn’t isolated. The next year, in 2018, Chinese Ambassador to the U.S. didn’t mince words when accusing the U.S. of “bullying” China. By 2019, the Chinese Foreign Ministry echoed a similar sentiment, with spokesperson Geng Shuang declaring China’s willingness to enact “countermeasures” against U.S. tariffs.

Such bristling postures aren’t without repercussions. Data from a 2020 Pew Research Center survey pinpoints this. Favorable American perceptions of China plummeted from a robust 72% in 2005 to a mere 25% by 2020. Worryingly for global peace, 73% of the respondents viewed China as a direct threat to U.S. interests.

Advertisement

While the “Wolf Warrior” approach garners attention, the interpretation is divided. Some contend it paints China as an increasingly authoritarian state with expansionist aims, potentially threatening U.S. interests and those of its allies. Opponents argue this aggressive diplomatic stance is merely a response to U.S. provocations, casting the U.S. as the provocateur and China as a nation defending its rightful interests.

Border Disputes

The border disputes between China and India have long been a source of tension, with recent clashes serving as stark reminders of the ongoing conflict. In December 2022, skirmishes erupted near the Tawang sector of Arunachal Pradesh, resulting in minor injuries and underscoring the persistent volatility along the disputed border. The historical backdrop of the 3,440 km-long contested frontier highlights the complex nature of the conflict, where shifting geographical features often bring soldiers from both sides into direct confrontation, leading to periodic escalations and confrontations.

The risk of escalation looms large over the border disputes between China and India, given the nuclear capabilities of both nations. The Galwan Valley clash in June 2020, which saw casualties on both sides, marked a significant escalation and was the first fatal confrontation since 1975. Beyond the immediate military implications, the economic fallout of any escalation poses a significant concern, with China being one of India’s largest trading partners.

State-led Capitalism

China’s economic landscape is characterized by a distinctive model known as state-led capitalism, often dubbed the “China Model”. This approach blends national control and ownership of resources with a significant presence of private entrepreneurs driving economic activities. Under this model, the state maintains ownership of all land and exerts control over critical resources like energy and the financial system. While massive state-owned enterprises dominate sectors such as power and banking, the private sector contributes significantly to GDP growth, generating the majority of new jobs.

Critics lament China’s stringent control over its citizens’ rights and freedoms as a regressive step, while the expansion of Chinese influence in the West, allegedly through covert, coercive, or corrupt means, is seen as a direct challenge to the legitimacy of American democracy.

Advertisement

Media and Information Control

China’s stronghold over its media landscape, both domestically and in international Chinese language platforms, has intensified apprehensions regarding its role on the global stage, amplifying the narrative of China as a primary adversary.

Historically, China’s penchant for controlling information is not novel. Tracing back to the 19th century, one finds instances where the nation’s leaders clamped down on literary works and newspapers that dared to criticize the regime. As the world entered the 20th century, these restraints didn’t wane. Instead, they reached unprecedented heights.

Today’s China presents a media landscape where the government’s grip is absolute. They have a stranglehold over major media outlets, actively censoring narratives that may be perceived as controversial or detrimental to the party line. This containment isn’t just confined within China’s borders. Accusations often arise about Beijing manipulating international Chinese language media, employing them as vessels for propaganda and to disseminate disinformation.

The statistical portrayal of this scenario paints a stark picture. A 2019 survey by Reporters Without Borders places China in an alarming 177th position out of 180 countries concerning press freedom. This report underscores the extent of China’s media censorship, terming it the “most extensive” globally. More disturbing is its identification of China as one of the top jailers of journalists.

However, it’s essential to emphasize that while media control is significant, it’s just one piece of the puzzle. A mosaic of concerns, including China’s escalating military prowess, its robust diplomatic posture, and contentious human rights record, collectively shape its image as a formidable challenger in the global arena.

Advertisement

End Note

In summary, China’s rise as a global power has brought with it a myriad of complexities and challenges, shaping its image as an adversary in international relations. From territorial disputes and human rights violations to economic coercion and digital espionage, the multifaceted nature of China’s actions on the global stage has sparked debates and tensions across various spheres. While some argue for cooperation and mutual understanding, others perceive China’s assertiveness as a direct threat to global stability and democratic values. As the world navigates this intricate landscape, understanding the dynamics of China’s interactions with the international community remains paramount for shaping future diplomatic, economic, and security policies.

Related Topics:
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Analysis

Malaysia to Investigate Leaked Classified Chinese Note on South China Sea Dispute

Malaysia to Investigate Leaked Classified Chinese Note on South China Sea Dispute

Malaysia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs has launched an internal probe into the leak of a classified diplomatic note sent by China concerning oil exploration activities in the South China Sea. The move follows an article published by the Philippine Daily Inquirer on August 29, which detailed the contents of the confidential communication. The Malaysian government expressed grave concern over the breach, as the document constitutes an official communication channel between Beijing and Kuala Lumpur.

Background

In February 2024, China sent a classified diplomatic note to Malaysia, expressing concerns over Malaysia’s oil and gas exploration activities in the South China Sea. This note was leaked by the Philippine Daily Inquirer on August 29, 2024, drawing attention to ongoing regional tensions. The focus of China’s concern was Malaysia’s exploration near the Luconia Shoals, an area situated roughly 100 kilometers off the Malaysian state of Sarawak. While Malaysia asserts its rights to this region, China claims the area under its controversial nine-dash line, which covers nearly the entire South China Sea.

The diplomatic note highlights China’s longstanding claim over the South China Sea and highlights Beijing’s opposition to Malaysia’s exploration activities. According to the document, these activities infringe upon China’s territorial claims, and the note urges Malaysia to halt its operations immediately. This is not the first time such concerns have been raised, but the leak has brought the issue into sharper focus, putting additional strain on the diplomatic relations between the two nations.

Malaysia’s response to the leak has been swift. The country’s Foreign Ministry has initiated a police investigation into how the document was made public and launched an internal probe. Malaysia’s stance remains firm, with officials emphasizing that the country will continue to protect its sovereignty and pursue its interests in its maritime areas, in accordance with international law, specifically the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).

Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim further reinforced this position, stating that Malaysia will persist with its oil and gas exploration in the South China Sea despite the concerns raised by China. This development reflects the broader regional dynamics, as Malaysia, along with the Philippines, Vietnam, and Taiwan, all have overlapping claims in the South China Sea, making the area a significant flashpoint for international relations.

Advertisement

Recent Developments

The leaked diplomatic note highlights the sensitive and contentious nature of the territorial disputes in the South China Sea. It also sheds light on the careful balancing act Malaysia is attempting, as it seeks to assert its rights in the region while managing its diplomatic ties with China.

In its statement released on Wednesday, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs confirmed it is conducting an internal investigation and will be filing a police report to further scrutinize the incident. While the ministry refrained from naming the Philippine media outlet or verifying the authenticity of the note, it emphasized the need for swift action to prevent further leaks of classified materials. 

Malaysia Urged to Halt All activities in the South China Sea by China

The note in question reportedly urged Malaysia to halt all oil exploration and drilling operations in the Luconia Shoals, a resource-rich area located about 100 kilometers off the coast of Sarawak. According to the Inquirer, China claimed that Malaysia’s activities in the region violated its sovereignty under the controversial nine-dash line. China’s nearest landmass, Hainan Island, is situated approximately 1,300 kilometers from the disputed shoals.

The South China Sea dispute involves competing claims from multiple nations, including Malaysia, the Philippines, Vietnam, and Taiwan. China claims nearly the entire sea based on historical maps, despite a 2016 international arbitration ruling that dismissed the nine-dash line as legally baseless. Malaysia, while sharing strong economic ties with China, has now become entangled in the broader geopolitical tensions over control of these vital waters.

Advertisement

Malaysia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs reaffirmed its stance on the South China Sea, pledging to defend its sovereignty and interests in accordance with international law, including the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). The ministry noted that while Malaysia seeks peaceful resolution through dialogue, the country will remain firm in protecting its maritime rights.

Beijing has not commented on the leaked note. However, diplomatic tensions have flared in recent months, with China’s aggressive presence in the South China Sea leading to repeated confrontations, especially with the Philippines. Just this year, multiple stand-offs occurred between Chinese and Philippine coastguards near Second Thomas Shoal.

Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim has maintained a more diplomatic approach toward Beijing, stressing the importance of balancing national interests with regional stability. However, the leak has raised concerns about Malaysia’s ability to maintain this balancing act amid increasing pressure from China. Anwar has acknowledged China’s concerns over Malaysia’s energy activities but remains open to negotiations on resolving maritime disputes.

This incident marks the second time in recent months that China’s activities in the South China Sea have drawn public attention in Malaysia. Earlier this year, a standoff between Malaysian state oil company Petronas and Chinese vessels occurred near the same contested waters. Chinese survey ships have increasingly patrolled the area, challenging Malaysia’s economic activities within its Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ).

Despite these challenges, Malaysia’s foreign ministry highlighted that Kuala Lumpur and Beijing have committed to handling the South China Sea dispute diplomatically. Both nations co-chair discussions within the ASEAN framework aimed at reaching a Code of Conduct (COC) for the region, with negotiations expected to finalize in the coming years.

Advertisement

China’s claims over the South China Sea are based on the nine-dash line, a boundary dating back to 1947. However, the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague ruled in 2016 that this claim had no merit under international law, siding with the Philippines. China has disregarded the ruling, continuing to assert its claims through military and diplomatic means.

Malaysia’s role in the dispute is further complicated by its reliance on China as its largest trading partner. Since 2009, bilateral relations between the two nations have strengthened, even as Malaysia faced pressure from the international community to stand firm against Chinese encroachment on its EEZ.

The Luconia Shoals, where the recent conflict has surfaced, are located within Malaysia’s EEZ, recognized by UNCLOS. However, China’s claim extends beyond its geographic proximity, relying on historical maps to justify its territorial ambitions in the South China Sea.

While the dispute escalates, Malaysia’s foreign ministry reiterated that its focus remains on diplomatic engagement. The government has called on all nations involved to respect the principles of peaceful negotiation and avoid any actions that could lead to violence or further escalation in the region.

End Note

The leak of China’s diplomatic note adds complexity to Malaysia’s foreign policy strategy, as it seeks to maintain both economic ties with China and its sovereign rights in the contested waters. Analysts believe that Malaysia’s next steps will be closely watched, both by regional partners and global powers like the United States.

Advertisement

Malaysia remains engaged in ASEAN-led efforts to establish a Code of Conduct for the South China Sea, aimed at reducing tensions and fostering long-term peace.

The investigation into the leak is ongoing, with the Malaysian government prioritizing both national security and diplomatic engagement with China. As tensions persist, Malaysia faces the challenge of navigating its position in a rapidly evolving geopolitical landscape.

Continue Reading

Analysis

Can Saudis Survive Without Oil?

Can Saudis survive without Oil?

“Russia, Iran and Saudi Arabia depend on exporting Oil & Gas. Their economies will collapse if Oil & Gas suddenly give way to Solar & Wind.” (Yuval Noah Harari)

Oil has long been the backbone of Saudi Arabia’s economy and the driving force behind its development. As the world’s largest oil exporter, it’s challenging to envision a Saudi Arabia without oil. However, the country is now on a bold mission to reduce its dependence on oil revenue as the bedrock of its national economy. This push for economic diversification comes in the wake of a decade marked by oil market volatility, which has intensified the economic and political challenges faced by the ruling Al Saud family. Saudi Arabia possesses approximately 17% of the world’s proven petroleum reserves, making it one of the leading net exporters of petroleum and home to the world’s second-largest proven oil reserves. Saudi Aramco, one of the world’s largest integrated energy and chemical companies, operates across three segments: upstream, midstream, and downstream. In 2022, Aramco’s average hydrocarbon production was 13.6 million barrels per day, with crude oil accounting for 11.5 million barrels per day. The company proudly claims to produce the lowest-carbon barrel of oil in the industry and has committed to achieving net-zero emissions by 2050, ahead of the government’s 2060 target. Saudi Arabia continues to invest in cleaner conventional engines, carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS), hydrogen, and renewable energy sources. Despite these efforts, Saudi Arabia remains heavily reliant on oil, which contributes 42% to the country’s GDP, 90% of export earnings, and 87% of budget revenue.

Historical Context 

(March 3, 1938 CE: Oil discovered in Saudi Arabia) 

On March 3, 1938, an American-owned oil well in Dammam, Saudi Arabia, tapped into what would become the world’s largest petroleum reserve. This discovery profoundly transformed Saudi Arabia, the Middle East, and the global landscape—politically, economically, and geographically. Before the discovery, the majority of Saudi Arabians were nomadic, and the nation’s economy largely depended on the tourism industry, driven by religious pilgrimages to Mecca. The company responsible for the discovery, which later became Chevron, set the stage for a seismic shift in the country’s future.

In the wake of the discovery, Saudi engineers developed an extensive infrastructure of ports, refineries, pipelines, and oil wells. Today, oil accounts for 92% of Saudi Arabia’s budget, making the nation one of the world’s leading producers and exporters of petroleum. This wealth from oil has fostered high-level diplomatic relationships with the West, as well as with China, Japan, and Southeast Asia. Some argue that Saudi Arabia’s oil wealth allows it to wield significant influence over international foreign policy decisions, particularly those involving the Middle East.

Advertisement

The kingdom’s demographics have also been reshaped by the oil industry, attracting millions of foreign workers from the Middle East, South Asia, South East Asia and other regions of the world. The first oil discovery site near Dharan is now connected to a vast pipeline network that transports petroleum across the region.

Petrodollar System

Petrodollars refer to the revenues generated from oil exports, denominated in US dollars, and are not a separate currency but rather US dollars accepted by oil-exporting countries in exchange for their oil. In 2020, the global average for daily crude oil exports was around 88.4 million barrels. With an average price of $100 per barrel, this would translate into an annual global supply of petrodollars exceeding $3.2 trillion.

For many members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and non-OPEC oil and gas exporters like Russia, Qatar, and Norway, petrodollars are a primary source of income and wealth. The term “petrodollar” reflects the common practice of these nations accepting US dollars for crude oil transactions rather than a global trading system or a distinct currency. The US dollar is favored by oil exporters because of its global value in international investments, making it a practical store of value for oil revenues that need to generate returns.

A significant example of petrodollar recycling is the 1974 agreement between the United States and Saudi Arabia, where Saudi petrodollars were invested in U.S. Treasuries. The profits from these investments were later used to finance American arms sales to Saudi Arabia, as well as various development and assistance programs in the country. Today, many oil-exporting nations channel their petrodollars through sovereign wealth funds, investing in stocks, bonds, and other financial products. For example, one such fund holds nearly 1.5% of all publicly traded shares worldwide, with 72% of its investments in equities.

Advertisement

The petrodollar system has been crucial in facilitating smoother international trade by standardizing oil pricing, simplifying transactions, and reducing exchange rate risks for oil-importing nations. This system underpinned the strategic alliance between the United States, Saudi Arabia, and other oil-producing countries—a partnership that has significantly influenced global politics for decades. For oil-exporting nations, petrodollars have provided essential income, enabling reinvestment in infrastructure, drilling, and exploration projects, which in turn boosts oil production and drives technological advancements in the energy sector.

The petrodollar system has reinforced the US dollar’s status as the world’s primary reserve currency, driving global demand for it. Oil-exporting countries typically hold large reserves of US dollars, which they often invest in US government securities, thereby strengthening the US economy. This high demand for US dollars, fueled by oil trade, helps maintain a favorable US trade balance and ensures ample liquidity, making the dollar the most traded currency in the forex market.

However, the future of the petrodollar system is increasingly uncertain due to shifting geopolitical dynamics. On June 9, 2024, Saudi Arabia ended its 50-year petrodollar agreement with the United States, an event widely regarded as the “end of the petrodollar.” This agreement had been the cornerstone of the petrodollar system, and its termination marks a significant shift in the global economic landscape. With the end of this agreement, oil transactions may now be conducted in various currencies, including the yuan, euro, yen, and possibly even virtual currencies like Bitcoin.

These developments reflect a growing desire among nations to diversify economic risks and reduce their reliance on the US dollar. By diminishing the dollar’s dominance, these changes could lead to a more multipolar monetary system, granting countries greater financial independence and potentially creating a more balanced global economic environment. The rise of new economic alliances and the global shift towards sustainable energy alternatives further challenge the traditional oil-US dollar system. The transition to renewable energy could reduce global reliance on oil, thereby diminishing the significance of the US dollar and prompting a reevaluation of the current system.

As global energy and financial systems evolve, the role of the petrodollar is increasingly being questioned. The recent end of the US-Saudi agreement is a clear example of the shifting geopolitical and economic landscape. These changes may result in market volatility and the revaluation of various currencies, presenting both challenges and opportunities for the global economy. 

Advertisement

Diversification Efforts

Saudi Vision 2030 

“Given the nation’s climatic advantages, the Vision 2030 statement stresses the growth of renewable energy sources, such as solar and wind. Opportunities for Western businesses specializing in solar and wind technology, energy storage solutions, and green construction technologies arise from the target of producing 9.5 gigawatts of renewable energy by 2030. The country is a rich ground for renewable energy projects because of its large, sunny deserts and substantial investment in green energy.” (Rana Maristani) 

Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030 is a comprehensive plan launched on April 25, 2016, aimed at reducing the nation’s dependency on oil and diversifying its economy. Centered around three main themes, the framework outlines specific objectives to be achieved by 2030, including the development of ports, cultural assets, and tourism destinations to leverage Saudi Arabia’s strategic position at the crossroads of the Arab and Islamic worlds. A key element of the plan involves partially privatizing the national oil company, Aramco, and enhancing the resources and influence of the Saudi Public Investment Fund.

For decades, Saudi Arabia’s economic growth has been driven by oil, but this reliance has exposed the nation to the volatility of global crude prices. In the 1990s, while oil prices remained stagnant, government policies encouraging larger families led to a population boom. This growth, combined with a young, highly educated workforce, resulted in rising underemployment and unemployment rates, particularly among the youth.

Vision 2030 seeks to address these challenges by transforming Saudi Arabia’s economy over 15 years. The plan aims to improve the quality of life for citizens through world-class healthcare and education, equipping young people with the skills needed for future jobs. It also focuses on creating a diversified economy, emphasizing trade, tourism, high-tech industries, and a business-friendly environment to attract foreign direct investment and entrepreneurs. Key areas of diversification include cryptocurrency, artificial intelligence, and environmental sustainability.

Advertisement

In a significant milestone, Saudi Arabia’s non-oil sector contributed 50% of the GDP for the first time last year, signaling the success of the ongoing economic transformation. With Vision 2030, the Kingdom plans to inject $3 trillion in foreign investment into its economy, driving further growth and offering new opportunities for multinational companies. As the nation continues its economic revolution, it is well-positioned for a promising future.

“Saudi Arabia is becoming more welcoming to foreign investment as it works to advance living standards, build non-oil sectors, and upgrade infrastructure. The Kingdom has taken the initiative in recent years to improve the investment climate by enacting policies that improve business regulations, providing incentives, and establishing special economic zones that offer advantages like tax breaks and business support services.” (Rana Maristani)

Difficulties and Vulnerabilities 

The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is confronted with various obstacles and weaknesses, chiefly arising from the vagaries of international markets and oil prices. The country urgently has to diversify its economy and lessen its reliance on oil revenue, as this instability in the economy highlights. The country also needs to deal with environmental issues and the global shift to renewable energy sources, which puts further strain on its established economic structure. Given that oil exports account for a sizeable amount of Saudi Arabia’s national income, the country’s economy is greatly impacted by the volatility of oil prices. It is challenging for the nation to keep a solid economic outlook due to the unpredictability of the world oil market. As a result, the kingdom has been actively pursuing measures for economic diversification through its Vision 2030 project, with the goal of fostering the growth of non-oil industries including technology, entertainment, and tourism. The world’s need for oil is predicted to decrease as it moves toward renewable and sustainable energy sources. The adoption of greener technologies and investments in renewable energy projects are imperative in light of this worldwide trend. Saudi Arabia, seeing the need to change with the energy environment, has begun to investigate and invest in solar and wind energy. The main issues facing Saudi Arabia are its dependency on oil for its economy, the instability of the market, and the necessity of embracing environmental sustainability. For the country to have long-term economic stability and growth, these problems must be resolved.

Financial Resilience  

After a year of minimal growth in 2023, the Saudi economy is expected to start recovering in 2024, though its success will largely hinge on the government’s oil production policies. The economic downturn in 2023 was exacerbated by the monarchy’s unilateral decision to cut oil output by one million barrels per day from July 2023 through the end of the year to support oil prices. This move led to a self-inflicted economic slump. However, with an anticipated increase in oil production and exports, along with continued expansion in the non-oil sector, real GDP growth is projected to rise by approximately 2% in the latter half of 2024, aligning with historical averages since 2014.

A significant budget deficit is likely to persist, potentially dampening energy and construction projects, particularly with the resurgence of regional conflicts. Despite these challenges, Saudi Arabia is expected to continue investing heavily in large-scale projects.

Advertisement

Saudi Arabia’s reliance on agri-food imports, particularly grain, remains substantial, but the kingdom has managed to find alternatives due to its purchasing power. Inflation is projected to remain around 2%, supported by substantial export earnings, significant reserves that maintain the currency peg with the US dollar, and a rigorous monetary tightening cycle that began in March 2022 alongside the US Federal Reserve.

Oil prices will continue to be a key driver of the economy, providing essential funding for Vision 2030’s long-term objectives. Decisions made by OPEC and its partners, including Russia, Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan, Mexico, and Oman (OPEC+), have struggled to maintain crude oil prices above USD 80 per barrel, a level deemed necessary for most OPEC+ countries to balance their trade and fiscal needs. Attempts to increase production limits have been hindered by renewed geopolitical tensions in the Middle East, benefiting countries not constrained by output limits. 

Non-Oil Prospects

In 2022, Saudi Arabia’s economy grew faster than any other G20 nation, with overall growth reaching 8.7% and non-oil GDP expanding by 4.8%. The non-oil sector saw its most robust growth since Q3 2021, increasing by 6.2% in Q4 2022. For 2023, the non-oil sector is expected to grow by 4.7%, driven primarily by strong private consumption and significant private sector investments, particularly in construction, retail, wholesale, and transportation. This shift highlights the growing role of the private sector in Saudi Arabia’s evolving economy.

Vision 2030 aims to increase the non-oil GDP share to 50% by 2030 and diversify non-oil exports. Key sectors for focus include finance, insurance, transportation, communication, non-oil manufacturing, and agriculture. In 2023, non-oil revenues surged by 9%, while oil revenues fell by 3% due to declining crude prices. To reduce reliance on oil, the Saudi government has implemented significant budgetary reforms including revenue enhancement, spending rationalization, Treasury Single Account implementation, energy price reforms, fiscal risk assessments, improved budget transparency, and strengthened debt management.

The non-oil sector is seen as a crucial component for managing the increasing number of Saudi nationals entering the labor market each year. It offers greater stability, sustainability, and job creation compared to the volatile oil sector.

Advertisement

Geographical Consequences 

The stability of the region and worldwide alliances are greatly impacted by Saudi Arabia’s strategic position in the world oil markets. Being one of the world’s top oil producers, the Kingdom has significant influence over the availability and cost of energy worldwide. Saudi Arabia is able to shape alliances and regional dynamics thanks to its advantageous geopolitical position. The potential of the Kingdom to influence or destabilize the oil markets can have significant ramifications for countries that import and export petroleum products. Global markets closely follow Saudi Arabia’s decisions about the amount of oil produced, as these decisions have the potential to affect global economic conditions. Its position in the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), where it frequently takes the lead in coordinating member states’ production policies, is another example of this power. Saudi Arabia’s energy policy and geopolitical ambitions are closely related on a regional level. Part of the reason for its partnerships with major world powers, especially the US, is shared energy interests. Additionally, the Kingdom can support or oppose different regional actors due to its money and influence, which has an impact on regional stability. Saudi Arabia’s oil interests and the need to preserve its dominant position in the region play a major role in its engagement in crises and diplomatic attempts throughout the Middle East, particularly its attitude on Iran.

Inference 

When one considers Saudi Arabia’s transition from an oil-dependent economy to one that is more diverse, one can see that the Kingdom is at a turning point. Although there is uncertainty about the future during this shift, it emphasizes how important it is to be resilient and adaptable. By adopting strategic planning, encouraging innovation, and making a commitment to sustainable development, Saudi Arabia is managing this transition. Even though there are still obstacles to overcome, the Kingdom’s initiatives to lessen its reliance on oil earnings and investigate new business opportunities represent a substantial step in the direction of a more diverse and sustainable future. In essence, Saudi Arabia’s long-term economic growth and stability will depend greatly on its capacity to adjust to these changes. Although the road ahead is difficult, the Kingdom’s proactive strategy presents a viable way forward.

Continue Reading

Analysis

Why the Monsoon Season is lifeline for Entire South and South East Asia?

Why the Monsoon Season is lifeline for Entire South and South East Asia?

The monsoon, derived from the Arabic word mausim, meaning “season,” is a critical climatic phenomenon characterized by dramatic weather changes, including distinct wet and dry seasons. This seasonal wind pattern is defined by a reversal in wind direction, which transports moisture-laden air from the ocean onto land, significantly influencing regional climates.

In South and East Asia, the monsoon system comprises two main components: the South Asian Summer Monsoon (SASM) and the East Asian Summer Monsoon (EASM). The SASM, integral to the tropical monsoon circulation, affects countries like India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan, and Sri Lanka. It begins in June and lasts until September, playing an important role in replenishing water sources and supporting agriculture across these regions. This monsoon operates within the Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ), which is displaced from the equator and influences the Indian subcontinent, the Indo-China Peninsula, and the South China Sea.

On the other hand, the EASM, which affects China, Japan, and Korea, is clearly extratropical. It is linked to frontal systems and the jet stream, which have an impact on the winds and precipitation patterns in these regions. Both monsoon systems impact extends beyond weather; it is a lifeline for millions in these regions, influencing agriculture, water resources, and economic stability. Understanding its role is crucial for appreciating its importance in sustaining life and supporting economies in South and East Asia.

Historical and Cultural Significance

Throughout antiquity, the monsoon has been a driving force behind the growth of ancient civilizations and the establishment of trade routes across South and East Asia. Likewise, the Indus Valley Civilization heavily depended on monsoon rains for agriculture. These seasonal downpours were essential for cultivating key crops like wheat and rice. The consistent arrival of the monsoon was crucial to the civilization’s prosperity, enabling it to thrive in the region that now encompasses modern-day Pakistan and northwest India.

Similarly, during the Han Dynasty (206 BCE–220 CE) in ancient China, the monsoon played a pivotal role. The rains enabled rice cultivation in the Yangtze River Basin, which was vital for feeding the empire’s vast population and sustaining its political, economic, and social systems. The regularity of the monsoon allowed for effective agricultural planning, contributing significantly to the stability and growth of the Han Empire.

Advertisement

The monsoon also facilitated extensive trade across the Indian Ocean. The seasonal winds were instrumental for ancient mariners navigating trade routes that connected the Arabian Peninsula with the Indian subcontinent and Southeast Asia. This network, known as the “monsoon trade routes,” was essential for exchanging goods such as spices and silk, as well as cultural and technological knowledge. It linked diverse civilizations and fostered economic and cultural interactions across the region.

Culturally, the monsoon profoundly shaped traditions and festivals in these regions. In India, festivals like Onam and Durga Puja celebrate the monsoon’s arrival and its impact on agriculture. Onam, observed in Kerala, marks the end of the monsoon season with vibrant feasts and community gatherings, while Durga Puja, celebrated in West Bengal, coincides with the monsoon’s peak and symbolizes renewal and abundance.

In Bangladesh, the Bengali New Year, or Boishakhi, coincides with the onset of the monsoon rains. The festival features lively celebrations that honor the rains, essential for rice cultivation, highlighting the monsoon’s role in both agricultural productivity and cultural heritage. These festivals depict that the monsoon is not just a weather pattern but a vital element of cultural identity and social life in South and East Asia.

Agricultural Dependence

The monsoon season plays a vital role in agriculture across South and East Asia, significantly impacting crop cultivation, water supply, and overall agricultural productivity.

Advertisement

Monsoon rains are important for the growth of key crops in these regions. In South Asia, countries like India and Bangladesh heavily depend on the monsoon for cultivating staple crops such as rice and wheat. The arrival of the monsoon signals the start of the planting season for these crops. The consistent and abundant rainfall provided by the monsoon supports not only rice paddies but also other essential crops like cotton and sugarcane. Similarly, in East Asia, monsoon rains are critical for growing crops such as soybeans and tea. The rainfall allows farmers to plan their planting and harvesting schedules effectively, ensuring a stable food supply.

In addition to supporting crop growth, the monsoon is essential for replenishing water supplies. The intense rains of the monsoon season refill rivers, lakes, and reservoirs, which are important for sustaining irrigation systems throughout the dry months. In regions like India, monsoon rains replenish reservoirs with water that is used for irrigation during the dry season, ensuring the continuity of crop cultivation. The stored water is vital for maintaining soil moisture levels and supporting agricultural activities year-round.

Economic Implications

The monsoon season has a profound impact on the economies of South and East Asia, particularly in the agricultural sector. Agriculture is a major economic driver in these regions, employing a large portion of the workforce and contributing significantly to GDP. In India, for example, agriculture employs approximately 50% of the labor force and accounts for around 17–20% of the country’s GDP. In the final quarter of 2023, the agricultural sector in India contributed over 7 trillion Indian rupees to the nation’s GDP, showing a marked increase compared to the third quarter. The performance of the agricultural industry is closely tied to the monsoon season, as rainfall directly influences crop yields and productivity. A successful monsoon season leads to higher agricultural output, boosting GDP and creating employment opportunities in rural areas. Conversely, a weak or erratic monsoon can result in lower crop yields, negatively affecting agricultural income and employment.

Monsoon rains also play a crucial role in hydroelectric power generation. In countries like China and India, rivers fed by monsoon rains are vital for producing hydroelectric energy. The increased water flow during the monsoon season significantly contributes to hydroelectric power output in these nations. For instance, India’s hydroelectric power capacity relies heavily on seasonal rains to maintain reservoir levels that power turbines. The energy produced is essential for running infrastructure, industries, and households, thereby supporting economic stability and growth.

Additionally, the monsoon’s effects extend to various industries that depend on a consistent water supply. Water is a critical component in the manufacturing processes of several industries, including beverages, paper products, and textiles. Adequate monsoon rains ensure a steady water supply for these sectors, which is vital for maintaining production levels and operational efficiency. However, irregularities in the monsoon can lead to water shortages, disrupting industrial operations. For example, a reduction in water availability can drive up production costs and decrease output, impacting economic performance and overall industrial productivity.

Advertisement

Environmental and Ecological Impact

In South and East Asia, the monsoon season is vital for preserving biodiversity. The seasonal rains create an ideal environment for a wide range of plants and animals, supporting diverse ecosystems. According to National Geographic, the monsoon rains nourish tropical forests, fostering rich vegetation that sustains various animal species. For example, the monsoon contributes to the Western Ghats’ biodiversity by providing essential moisture for numerous plant species, which in turn supports habitats for birds, tigers, and elephants. Similarly, in Southeast Asia, monsoon rains sustain extensive wetlands and jungles that are home to many rare and endangered species.

Monsoon rains are critical for maintaining the flow of major rivers like the Ganges and the Brahmaputra, as well as the surrounding ecosystems. This replenishment helps preserve wetlands and floodplains, which act as natural water storage areas and provide habitat for a wide array of wildlife. Additionally, the monsoon’s water inflow plays a key role in ensuring a steady supply of water for drinking and agriculture throughout the year.

Furthermore, the monsoon season enhances soil fertility by depositing nutrient-rich silt. According to the Pinion Advisory, the monsoon rains inundate agricultural lands and disperse fertile silt, which supports the nitrogen cycle. This process enriches the soil, and boost its fertility for crop cultivation. The replenishment of soil nutrients encourages sustainable farming practices and reduces the reliance on synthetic fertilizers. Maintaining soil health also depends on the preservation of soil structure and prevention of erosion, both of which are supported by the additional moisture provided by monsoon rains.

Challenges and Risks

For many people in South and East Asia, the monsoon season is a lifeline, yet it increasingly signals impending disaster. Countries like Bangladesh, China, Pakistan, and India, which heavily rely on agriculture, are particularly vulnerable to the monsoon’s unpredictable and intense weather patterns.

The monsoon season can pose serious challenges, primarily through severe flooding and landslides. Intense monsoon rains often lead to rivers overflowing, resulting in widespread flooding that can damage infrastructure, displace communities, and disrupt lives. The fertile plains of Pakistan and India, crucial for agricultural production, are especially at risk. Bangladesh, with its low-lying topography, is one of the most flood-prone countries in the world. Despite investing in flood control infrastructure like drainage systems, flood shelters, and embankments, Bangladesh remains highly vulnerable. China, despite its advanced flood control measures, including extensive water management systems, reservoirs, and irrigation infrastructure, has also recently faced significant flooding, highlighting the ongoing challenge of managing monsoon variability.

Advertisement

Conversely, insufficient or delayed rains can lead to droughts and water shortages. Irregular monsoon patterns disrupt the timing and amount of precipitation necessary for effective crop cultivation and water resource replenishment. Prolonged periods of inadequate rainfall result in reduced water availability for drinking, agriculture, and other essential uses, impacting the economy, increasing food prices, and stressing water supplies.

Climate change is exacerbating the impacts of the monsoon, making weather events more extreme and unpredictable. Shifts in the duration, intensity, and timing of monsoon rains complicate water resource management and agricultural planning. Unpredictable patterns can lead to both extreme wet and dry conditions within the same season. Additionally, rising temperatures and altered atmospheric conditions are likely to increase the frequency and severity of extreme weather events, such as cyclones and heavy rainfall, posing new threats to ecosystems and communities.

Technological and Policy Responses

Advancements in weather forecasting have greatly enhanced the ability to predict monsoon patterns. Historically, the complex interactions within the atmosphere made forecasting the monsoon challenging. However, recent improvements in meteorological research and technology have significantly increased forecasting accuracy. Modern tools such as satellite imagery, remote sensing, and climate models are crucial for predicting the monsoon’s onset, intensity, and duration. These technologies provide precise data on wind patterns, sea surface temperatures, and atmospheric conditions, allowing meteorologists to deliver more accurate and timely forecasts. This improved forecasting helps communities better prepare for and mitigate the impacts of extreme weather events associated with the monsoon.

In regions dependent on monsoon rains, advances in irrigation technology have transformed water management practices. Traditional irrigation methods often led to soil erosion and inefficient water use. Recent innovations have focused on precision irrigation systems, such as spray and drip irrigation, which deliver water directly to plant roots and reduce waste.

Governments have implemented various programs to address monsoon-related challenges and maximize its benefits. Investments in flood-risk management infrastructure, including levees, dams, and flood drainage systems, are examples of policy initiatives aimed at mitigating flood damage. Early warning systems and emergency response plans have been established to provide timely alerts and coordinate disaster management during extreme weather events.

Advertisement

End Note

The monsoon is undeniably the lifeblood of South and East Asia, profoundly affecting the region’s climate, agriculture, and economy. Its seasonal rains are crucial for nurturing essential crops, replenishing water supplies, and supporting millions of livelihoods. The monsoon’s influence extends across daily life, energy production, agriculture, and biodiversity. However, the challenges posed by extreme weather events such as droughts and floods, exacerbated by climate change, present significant risks. Balancing these risks with the monsoon’s benefits requires careful planning and proactive measures. Technological innovation, adaptive agricultural practices, and improved weather forecasting are vital for managing the monsoon’s changing patterns.

Continue Reading

Trending