Connect with us


Ferdinand Marcos’ Regime; From Leadership to Dictatorship!

Ferdinand Marcos From Leadership to Dictatorship


The history of the Philippines is deeply etched with the imprints of successive colonial empires. Notably, the period of American colonialism, spanning from 1898 to 1946, stands as a pivotal chapter. Following the 1898 Treaty of Paris, the Philippines transitioned from Spanish rule to American authority in the aftermath of the Spanish-American War. This era of American colonialism wielded substantial influence over the Philippines, ushering in both positive and adverse transformations. Noteworthy achievements included the constructive introduction of public education and enhancements to physical infrastructure such as roads and bridges. Yet, this period was not devoid of challenges, with the Philippine-American War (1899–1902) serving as a stark testament to the Filipinos’ struggle for independence. Despite the establishment of the Philippine Commonwealth in 1935, complete independence for the nation only materialized in 1946, following the conclusion of World War II.

Post-independence, the Philippines grappled with a landscape characterized by political unrest, social reforms, and economic hardships. Prior to President Ferdinand Marcos declaring martial law in 1972, the nation confronted economic obstacles, including issues related to land reform, income inequality, and an over-reliance on agriculture. The agrarian sector faced challenges stemming from outdated agricultural practices and inadequate infrastructure, exacerbating social instability through concentrated land ownership among a select elite. Additionally, the Philippines’ economy, reliant on a limited range of essential exports like sugar and coconut, proved vulnerable to external disruptions. Political instability and corruption, further hindered economic development, with the decade preceding Marcos marked by transitions and instability, setting the stage for the implementation of martial law in 1972. Despite these challenges, efforts during this period aimed at overcoming obstacles and achieving sustainable growth, reflecting the resilience of the Philippines.

Rise of Ferdinand Marcos and His Early Economic Policies (1965-1972)

After distinguishing himself in World War II, Ferdinand Marcos rose to prominence in Philippine politics, assuming the presidency in 1965. His tenure marked the inception of a transformative era characterized by societal advancements, economic initiatives, and modernization. Marcos, leveraging his leadership acumen, aimed to propel the Philippines towards economic prosperity, pledging to tackle challenges such as poverty and unemployment through a comprehensive expansion strategy. This strategy encompassed infrastructure development, land reforms, and industry initiatives, with the maxim “Build, Build, Build” epitomizing the administration’s commitment to construction endeavors. Despite the visionary approach, challenges arose, particularly in the areas of land distribution, where Marcos’ land reform policies faced significant hurdles, leading to persistent issues of social injustice and inequality.

In the initial years of Marcos’ presidency, signs of economic progress were evident, with improved infrastructure, enhanced communication, and accessibility for commerce. Industrialization initiatives further contributed to the perception of advancement, although this early success came at a cost. Marcos heavily relied on borrowed funds to finance expansive projects, leading to a surge in external debt that shadowed future financial challenges. As the 1970s unfolded, the Philippines entered a period of political and economic instability, casting doubts on the sustainability of Marcos’ economic vision.

Martial Law and the Descent into Economic Turmoil (1972-1981)

In 1972, Ferdinand Marcos proclaimed martial law on the pretext that it was essential to quell insurrection and reinstate order. Marcos was able to reign by decree, thus circumventing established democratic norms, by this proclamation. The implementation of martial law in the Philippines significantly influenced numerous facets of society, including economic policies. Marcos strengthened his authority and centralized economic decision-making. As the government exerted greater control over critical institutions, civil liberties declined. The business climate was constricted, and political dissent was repressed.

To maintain political authority and finance ambitious infrastructure initiatives, the Marcos administration augmented government borrowing substantially. Significant growth in foreign debt resulted in debt service consuming a considerable portion of the national budget. During this period, crony capitalism and pervasive corruption emerged. Marcos and his associates, in return for the political support of a select group of corporate executives, granted them access to profitable contracts and privileges. Collaboration between the government and influential businessmen nurtured a culture of corruption that afflicted the nation for decades.

As a result of prioritizing political allegiance over economic efficacy, productive sectors experienced a diversion of resources. Instead of fostering extensive economic expansion, resources were consolidated among a minuscule cohort of associates affiliated with the Marcos regime. The implementation of this approach impeded the growth of sectors that had the potential to contribute to sustainable development and obstructed the establishment of robust competition. The agricultural sector was adversely affected by the inequitable distribution of resources resulting from insufficient emphasis on rural development and land reform. The disregard for these sectors further exacerbated the enduring poverty and inequality within the Philippines.

During the martial law regime, the Philippines’ economic situation declined, notwithstanding initial indications of advancement. The nation was confronted with the adverse repercussions of crony capitalism, excessive reliance on debt, and economic mismanagement. The income gap and the destitution rate both widened. A privileged minority benefited disproportionately from economic development, whereas the majority of Filipinos were confronted with escalating living expenses and limited employment opportunities. As the urban-rural divide increased, social tensions also intensified. In 1981, following the end of martial law, the Philippines was beset by an economic catastrophe. A substantial quantity of foreign debt, an unstable economy, and a population that had endured ten years of totalitarian rule characterized the nation.

Economic Crisis, Debt Default, and the People’s Uprising (1981-1986)

The Philippines was beset by a severe economic crisis in the early 1980s. The unmanageable level of foreign debt emerged as a consequence of the Marcos administration’s extravagant borrowing to finance infrastructure initiatives and preserve political authority. Repayment of the nation’s liabilities was a significant burden, consuming a substantial portion of the national budget. On the contrary, the nation was mired in an economic impasse characterized by hyperinflation, a depreciating currency, and insufficient foreign exchange reserves.

Financial assistance programs were extended by international financial institutions, including the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF), in response to the economic crisis that gripped the Philippines. The most significant stipulation underlying these bundles was the execution of structural and economic reforms.

The convergence of structural changes mandated by global financial institutions and the economic crisis led to a substantial escalation in both underemployment and unemployment. Due to the failure of businesses and industries, a great number of Filipinos lost their jobs. Mismanagement of the economy during the martial law period, in which funds were squandered on initiatives that failed to foster long-term prosperity, exacerbated the gravity of the crisis. The social unrest was exacerbated by the worsening economic conditions, which also established the foundation for a broad-based retaliation from the populace against the Marcos regime.

The 1986 People Power Revolution exemplified the pinnacle of discontent and resistance from the general populace against the Marcos regime. Large-scale nonviolent demonstrations wherein Filipinos from various sectors of society united in support of a diverse coalition, advocated for the removal of Marcos’ autocratic regime. In February 1986, in response to mounting pressure and the withdrawal of support from the military and other crucial allies, Marcos abandoned the Philippines and commenced exile in Hawaii. A turning point in Philippine history, the People Power Revolution symbolized the success of the collective will of the common people in triumphing over an oppressive government. The Philippines encountered an enormous challenge as the post-Marcos era unfolded: reconstructing a devastated economy and instituting a more inclusive and answerable political structure. The circumstances of this period laid the foundation for the subsequent political and economic affluence of the nation.

Legacy of the Marcos Regime and Lessons Learned

The economy of the Philippines was significantly and persistently impacted by the Marcos regime’s legacy. His presidency was marked by crony capitalism, excessive borrowing, and incompetent management, all of which contributed to a catastrophic debt crisis caused by his economic policies. As a result of placing politically motivated initiatives ahead of sustainable development, poverty and wealth disparities were exacerbated. The economic crisis of the 1980s caused pervasive underemployment and unemployment, which affected vulnerable industries disproportionately. The repercussions of these measures persisted well beyond the tenure of Marcos in office.

After the Marcos dictatorship ended, the economy of the Philippines was confronted with substantial structural obstacles. The country was confronted with challenges such as substantial foreign debt, repercussions of economic mismanagement, and the necessity for structural reforms to promote sustainable development. To facilitate the process of economic reconstruction, it was critical to confront challenges including corruption, inadequate institutions, and a dearth of inclusive policies. While structural reforms imposed by international financial institutions were critical to restoring economic stability, they also demonstrated that the Philippines needed to strengthen and diversify its primary industries, reduce its reliance on debt, and promote inclusive growth.

Following Marcos, the Philippines embarked on a path of reform and recovery. Taking lessons from the past, the country has sought to implement policies that promote equitable growth, sustainable development, and good governance. Policymakers working to build a more resilient and equitable future for the Philippines can learn from the Marcos administration’s mistakes.

International Context

The Philippines became entangled in this geopolitical struggle as a result of the US-Soviet competition, which had global ramifications. As a former colonial power and ally, the United States of America has a strategic interest in the Philippines. During the Cold War, the Philippines’ economy became increasingly reliant on foreign assistance, particularly from the United States. This reliance influenced the country’s political and economic ideologies.

Worldwide economic shocks, such as variations in the price of oil, significantly impacted the Philippine’s economy. The geopolitical upheavals in the Middle East in the 1970s prompted oil crises and increased energy prices, which contributed to inflation and economic troubles in the Philippines. Because it relied on oil imports, the country was vulnerable to external shocks. Likewise, the debt crisis and the early 1980s global economic recession added to the Philippines’ economic burden. The recession exacerbated the challenges caused by the country’s debt load and affected export markets, reducing demand for Philippine exports.

International financial institutions such as the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) were critical in responding to the Philippines’ debt issue. They proposed financial aid measures to help the Philippine economy stabilize. These packages, however, came with conditions, such as economic and structural improvements aimed at addressing the root causes of the crisis.


The People Power Revolution, American colonial control, and Marcos’ government all played key parts in the Philippines’ challenging economic history. Global shocks exacerbated the Marcos regime’s debt dilemma and economic incompetence. Cold War dynamics influenced reliance on foreign help. International organizations intervened and enforced recovery obligations. The People Power Revolution of 1986 marked a shift toward more inclusive governance. Among the lessons to be learned are the importance of responsible borrowing, inclusive development, competent economic management, and strong institutions. These lessons will serve as a road map for the Philippines’ future economic development as an open, accountable, and healthy economy.


South Korea Protests Japanese Leaders’ Offerings to Yasukuni Shrine

South Korea Protests Japanese Leaders' Offerings to Yasukuni Shrine

On April 21, 2024, South Korea voiced strong disapproval over Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida’s visit and offering at Tokyo’s Yasukuni Shrine, a site that Beijing and Seoul view as a symbol of Japan’s historical military aggression. The shrine commemorates around 2.5 million war dead, including 14 Japanese wartime leaders convicted as war criminals by an Allied tribunal. This action has sparked renewed tensions, as it is not the first time such visits have elicited protests from South Korea and China.

South Korea’s response emphasized the need for Japanese leaders to confront their nation’s wartime history with honesty, humility, and genuine repentance. Seoul sees this as essential groundwork for fostering improved relations between the two countries. Visits to Yasukuni Shrine by Japanese leaders have consistently provoked outrage from both China and South Korea due to the shrine’s association with convicted war criminals alongside other war dead.

Prime Minister Kishida’s recent offering at Yasukuni Shrine has rekindled longstanding sensitivities and disagreements over this contentious issue, highlighting deep-seated historical grievances that continue to strain relations in East Asia. This move, which took place on April 21, 2024, has drawn sharp condemnation from South Korea, which expressed “deep disappointment” over what it sees as a failure by Japanese leaders to address their country’s historical responsibilities.

The Yasukuni Shrine, established in 1869 during Japan’s Meiji era, is intended to honor the souls of those who died in service to their nation. However, the shrine’s legacy is complex, as it also enshrines 14 Class-A war criminals convicted by the Allies after World War II. This duality has made Yasukuni a flashpoint for regional tensions, particularly with South Korea and China.

In response to Kishida’s actions, South Korea urged Japanese leaders to confront history with humility and repentance, emphasizing the importance of acknowledging wartime atrocities as a foundation for improved bilateral ties. Japanese officials, however, defend visits to Yasukuni Shrine as matters of cultural tradition and national identity, asserting that they honor fallen soldiers without endorsing past aggression. For many Japanese citizens, the shrine holds personal significance as a place to mourn loved ones lost in battle.

The incident reflects broader regional dynamics shaped by historical grievances and territorial disputes. The complexities of historical memory pose formidable challenges as each country seeks to assert its national identity and security interests.

Continue Reading


Why is the Philippines Asia’s Most Unique Country?

Why is the Philippines Asia's Most Unique Country

Have you ever pondered why the Philippines stands out more in contrast to its neighbouring nations?

The Filipino are globally recognized for their warm and hospitable demeanour. They embody hospitality to the fullest extent. Their smiles shine as brightly as their tropical sun, and their hearts are as vast as their archipelago. Within their communities, there exists a distinctive blend of joy and resilience, reflecting a caring and amiable spirit. Whether one is a local or a visitor, Filipinos welcome them as part of the family, ensuring they feel at home in their stunning islands. Known for their willingness to extend a helping hand, their kindness knows no bounds, surpassing cultural and linguistic differences.

The Philippines host a wealth of endemic wildlife. It is home to a plethora of distinctive species found nowhere else on planet earth. Take, for example, the Tarsiers, the world’s smallest primates. These captivating creatures, with their large eyes and agile bodies, are a sight to behold. However, the biodiversity extends beyond them. The archipelago is rich with a diverse range of flora and fauna, from the vibrant coral reefs beneath the ocean’s surface to the verdant rainforests that cover the islands. Every corner of the Philippines teems with life. It is this abundant blend of biodiversity that distinguishes the Philippines on the global stage.

The Philippines is a paradise for divers. Picture yourself diving into the depths of the Pacific Ocean, where history and nature converge in a spectacular display. Here, you’ll find a wealth of sunken Japanese shipwrecks from the Second World War, serving as silent reminders of the past. These underwater relics have transformed into thriving habitats for a diverse array of marine life, providing an otherworldly diving experience. From coral reefs filled with colourful fish to encounters with the magnificent whale sharks, the underwater scenery is truly breathtaking. And let’s not forget the occasional sighting of graceful sea turtles gliding by or playful dolphins leaping in the waves. It’s like entering a whole new realm where each dive promises a unique adventure for enthusiasts.

Let’s not overlook the Jeepneys. Picture a mobile kaleidoscope, a burst of vibrant hues and distinctive designs. That’s what a jeepney is all about. These aren’t your ordinary vehicles, mind you. Originating from the remnants of World War II, these former U.S. Military Jeeps were repurposed into a beloved mode of public transportation. Each one serves as a canvas, reflecting the owner’s individual flair, often adorned with religious, patriotic, or even pop culture themes. They’re more than just a way to get from one place to another; they’re a rolling symbol of the Filipino spirit of ingenuity and artistic expression. Beyond mere transportation, they represent Filipino culture, embodying the nation’s lively spirit.The Philippines, a nation abundant with natural wonders, boasts multiple active volcanoes. These geological marvels are not only captivating, but also attract adventurers and nature enthusiasts worldwide. Among them, three stand out: Mount Pinatubo, Taal, and Mayon. The eruption of Mount Pinatubo in 1991 was one of the largest of the 20th century, leaving behind a stunning crater lake. Taal, one of the world’s smallest volcanoes, is unique as it sits within a lake. Meanwhile, Mayon is renowned for its nearly perfect cone shape. These volcanoes not only draw tourists but also enrich the country’s soils, contributing to its status as a vital agricultural place. Their majestic and fiery presence adds an element of danger and excitement to the Philippines.

Moving on to the Philippines’ remarkable archipelago, this beautiful country comprises of more than 7,100 islands, each with its own distinct charm. Picture yourself relaxing on pristine beaches with the azure sea gently lapping at your feet, or exploring vibrant local markets and sampling a variety of exotic foods. Each island radiates a unique culture, woven from centuries of traditions and customs. From the bustling streets of Manila to the serene landscapes of Palawan, the Philippines embodies a land of contrasts.

Let’s explore the massage culture deeply ingrained in the Philippines lifestyle, often overlooked but rich in tradition. In every city and town, you’re likely to find a massage parlor or spa. Whether in the bustling streets of Manila or the secluded beaches of Palawan, a soothing massage is always within reach. These massages go beyond mere relaxation after a long day; they reflect Filipinos’ belief in holistic wellness. From traditional hilot massage, a centuries-old healing technique, to modern spa therapies, each session offers a journey to relaxation and rejuvenation. What’s more, these massages are remarkably affordable. Whether you’re a local or a tourist, indulging in a soothing massage is a must when in the Philippines. In the Philippines, relaxation isn’t just a luxury; it’s a way of life.

Another wonderland of the Philippines is Puerto Princesa Underground River. It isn’t just a river; it’s a journey into the depths of the Earth. Located on the island of Palawan, this underground marvel stretches for 8 kilometres, guiding you through a subterranean world filled with stalactites and stalagmites, where darkness blends with the gentle flow of the river. Designated as a UNESCO World Heritage Site and one of the New Seven Wonders of Nature, it has become a must-visit destination for explorers and nature enthusiasts alike. Picture yourself gliding through an underground cathedral, where each corner holds a story of millions of years back from the history. It covers the essence of untouched beauty and thrilling adventure.

For over 300 years, the Philippines was under Spanish rule, leaving a lasting impact on the country’s cultural landscape. This influence is evident in various aspects of Filipino life. One of the most prominent legacies of Spanish colonization is seen in the country’s architecture. The Spanish introduced a fusion of native and European styles, resulting in a distinctive architectural form known as Bahay na Bato. These stone houses, decorated with sleek carvings and capiz shell windows, can still be found in many parts of the country, serving as a reminder of the country’s colonial past.

In the realm of art, the Spanish brought Western painting techniques and styles, which Filipino artists embraced and adapted to reflect their own experiences and perspectives. This amalgamation of Eastern and Western influences has given rise to a diverse and vibrant art scene. Similarly, Spanish influence permeates Philippine literature, from epic folk narratives to lyrical love songs known as Kundiman. Spanish literary forms have been interwoven into Filipino storytelling, filling it with a richness and depth that continues to dazzle audiences today.

Another uniqueness of the Philippines is their cuisine, which is a fascinating blend of influences from its diverse history, offering a flavourful journey that tantalizes the taste buds. Take, for instance, the infamous balut—a fertilized duck egg boiled and eaten in its shell—a delicacy not for the faint-hearted but a must-try for adventurous foodies. Then there’s adobo, hailed as the unofficial national dish, featuring a mix of soy sauce, vinegar, garlic, and spices simmered with chicken or pork, leaving a mouth-watering taste. Let’s not overlook the vibrant street food scene, offering skewered barbecue meats and the sweet and satisfying halo-halo—a popular dessert made with crushed ice, milk, and various other ingredients like sweet beans, jello, and fruits.

Continue Reading


Why BREXIT was a Historic British Mistake?

Was BREXIT a Historic Mistake


In the annals of British history, few events have generated as much controversy and debate as the decision to exit the European Union, commonly known as Brexit. The seismic shift, marked by the United Kingdom’s choice to disentangle itself from the European integration, holds profound historical significance that reverberates far beyond the political landscape. As the world watched, a contentious debate unfolded, pitting proponents of national sovereignty and autonomy against advocates for continued collaboration and shared economic prosperity within the European Union. Brexit, a portmanteau of “British exit,” was set into motion through a 2016 referendum that saw 51.9% of the UK electorate choosing to leave the EU. This watershed moment was driven by a number of factors, including concerns over immigration, a desire to reclaim national decision-making powers, and a perception that the EU’s bureaucratic structures were stifling British autonomy. However, the decision to untie from the European Union was not merely a contemporary political move; rather, it embedded itself in the broader historical context of Britain’s relationship with continental Europe. The vote to leave the European Union in 2016, and the four-year struggle to carry out that instruction, plunged the United Kingdom into an extended political crisis on a scale not seen in peacetime since decades. Brexit consumed two prime ministers, pushed both main parties to the electoral precipice and overturned the central economic and diplomatic strategy of every government since 1961. It established new political identities ‘Leavers’ and ‘Remainers’. The collision triggered two general elections, a series of unprecedented court cases and an attempt to suspend Britain’s parliamentary institutions. Brexit would blur the lines between the personal and the political, rupturing friendships, dividing families and stirring powerful emotions of vindication and loss. It would shape who had the prvilige to live in the UK, how laws are made and interpreted. It would also impact various socio-economic aspects of society including supply chains, sports, the environment, the workforce, and Northern Ireland’s stability.

Economic Impact

Politically, the Brexit question seems increasingly clear-cut in the United Kingdom, with most Britons believing that the exit from the European Union was a failure. Around 60% believe the decision was “a mistake”; just 10% think Brexit is going well “for now,” and just 30% expect it to be positive “in the long term.” Many blame Brexit for various problems like high inflation, struggling schools and hospitals, slow economy, and political instability.

In the short term, the economic impact of Brexit on UK-EU trade is evident through trade statistics for the year 2022. While the UK exported £340 billion of goods and services to the EU, constituting 42% of total UK exports, it imported £432 billion from the EU, resulting in a trade deficit of £92 billion. These figures underscore the significant economic interdependence between the UK and the EU, despite the challenges posed by Brexit.

Moreover, data indicates that both UK exports and imports to and from the EU have now exceeded pre-Brexit levels, albeit in current prices. However, caution is advised due to potential distortions caused by factors such as inflation and changes in data collection methods. The Office of Budgetary Responsibility warns of subdued trade volumes in the coming years due to sluggish growth and the evolving impact of Brexit, with net trade projected to make a negligible contribution to overall economic growth.

Looking ahead, the longer-term trends reveal a decline in the share of UK trade accounted for by the EU since 1999. Brexit has compounded economic challenges, with the OBR forecasting a reduction in potential productivity and a significant impact on trade intensity, relative to remaining in the EU. Despite these challenges, UK services trade has shown resilience, driven by sectors such as business services, albeit with declines in financial services and transport exports.

Brexit’s effects have been felt differently across sectors and regions. Wales, Northern Ireland, and industries such as accommodation and construction have been hit the hardest.

There’s also a noticeable gender disparity in the economic impact, with men being more affected than women. Additionally, UK goods trade has underperformed compared to other advanced economies post-Brexit.

EU immigration has decreased, while non-EU immigration, particularly from students, has increased. The uncertainty surrounding trade agreements, supply chains, and market access has contributed to economic upheaval in the UK.

Sovereignty and Autonomy

Recent surveys conducted by the European Union indicate that 56% of the British public now regrets the decision to leave the European Union. This reflects a complex view of Brexit’s consequences, with many reconsidering the trade-offs involved in reclaiming sovereignty.

Brexit was advocated as a way to regain sovereignty and escape perceived excessive control from Brussels. Supporters argued that leaving the EU would allow the UK to have more control over its laws, borders, and decision-making.

Ironically, leaving the EU has led to increased government control within the UK. While the goal was to regain autonomy, the process of separating from the EU required the UK government to establish new regulations, frameworks, and trade policies, leading to more national involvement and regulation.

The issue of immigration from Europe adds complexity, with concerns about the impact of free movement on job opportunities, schools, and crime rates in the UK. There’s pressure on UK governments to tighten border controls in response to these concerns.

The dilemma is exemplified by the situation in Northern Ireland, where Brexit decisions affect its relationship with both the UK and the EU. The debate over a “backstop agreement” highlights the challenges of managing border customs and agreements with the Republic of Ireland. Whether Northern Ireland is inside or outside the EU fence, contentious adjustments are likely.

Trade and Regulatory Constraints

Supporters of Brexit often framed the decision as a pathway to a rejuvenated Britain, free from the regulatory constraints imposed by Brussels. The argument centred on the idea that departing from the European Union would provide the UK with the flexibility to establish its own trade policies, regulations, and standards.

Contrary to the envisioned rejuvenation, the act of leaving the EU resulted in the disruption of established trade relationships. The UK’s departure from the single market and customs union introduced new complexities in trade, requiring the negotiation of individual trade deals and the establishment of new regulatory frameworks.

Brexit brought about the creation of new trade barriers between the UK and the EU. Customs checks, tariffs, and non-tariff barriers became significant challenges for businesses on both sides of the English Channel. The absence of seamless trade within the single market led to delays in the movement of goods, increased administrative burdens, and additional costs for companies engaged in cross-border trade. Specifically, the Northern Ireland Protocol introduced a unique set of challenges by creating a de facto customs border in the Irish Sea, aiming to prevent a hard border on the island of Ireland but resulting in trade disruptions and heightened tensions.

Businesses faced a multitude of challenges in adapting to the new trade landscape post-Brexit. The need for customs declarations, compliance with divergent regulatory standards, and increased paperwork added complexities. Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), in particular, encountered difficulties in navigating the new trade environment, which was characterized by uncertainty and a learning curve.

In essence, the facts surrounding trade and regulatory constraints post-Brexit highlight significant discrepancy between the envisioned benefits of a liberated Britain and the practical challenges that emerged.

Northern Ireland Protocol

The Northern Ireland Protocol, pivotal to the Brexit withdrawal agreement, aimed to prevent a hard border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland post-Brexit. This necessitated new customs procedures for EU goods entering Great Britain, impacting agri-food exports significantly, especially for Ireland, the UK’s largest food market.

The Protocol initially faced opposition due to concerns about its impact on trade and Northern Ireland’s delicate political history. To address these concerns, the UK and EU negotiated the Windsor Framework in 2023. This framework established separate lanes for goods entering Northern Ireland from Great Britain, with different levels of scrutiny based on their final destination.

Additionally, the UK government and the DUP agreed on the “Safeguarding the Union” deal, reducing checks and paperwork on goods going from Great Britain to Northern Ireland. This agreement, along with the Windsor Framework, aims to balance trade facilitation with regulatory compliance, with provisions like the “Stormont Brake” allowing Northern Ireland to object to EU rules affecting its trade arrangements.

Political and Social Divisions

Brexit has deepened political rifts across the UK, transcending traditional party lines and reshaping voter allegiances. The intense debate over Brexit exposed stark ideological differences, exacerbating divisions within the country.

Regional disparities in Brexit attitudes were glaringly evident, with some areas in England strongly favoring leaving the EU while Scotland and Northern Ireland leaned towards remaining. These differences have fueled tensions and sparked debates about the UK’s constitutional future, including calls for Scottish independence and concerns about peace in Northern Ireland.

Brexit also highlighted gaps between generations and educational levels, with younger and more educated demographics generally supporting EU membership. These divides persist in subsequent elections, influencing voting patterns and political affiliations.

The Brexit fallout continues to influence British politics, shaping election outcomes and party agendas. Issues like national identity, immigration, and economic sovereignty remain central, impacting political discourse and policy decisions.

Beyond politics, Brexit has strained social cohesion, leading to tensions within families and communities. The rifts exposed by the Brexit vote have prompted reflections on British identity and the challenges of fostering unity in a society marked by diverse perspectives.

A Way Forward

Moving forward, it’s imperative to transcend the divisive rhetoric of the past, particularly the fiery rhetoric of leaders like Nigel Farage and Boris Johnson, and focus on constructive solutions. As they take a back seat in politics, there’s an opportunity to learn from their policies’ shortcomings. Political leaders must prioritize national unity, engaging in meaningful dialogue to find common ground on Brexit-related issues. Economically, proactive measures are needed to support industries affected by Brexit, foster innovation, and promote inclusive growth. Socially, healing divisions exacerbated by Brexit is crucial, requiring efforts to bridge gaps between different groups and promote social cohesion. The UK’s post-Brexit role on the global stage should be defined by a commitment to democracy, human rights, and international cooperation, contributing to addressing global challenges alongside allies.

Continue Reading